Hogan, B. (2013). Pseudonyms as well as the go up of the actual?identity Online. Inside the A companion so you’re able to the latest media figure (pp. 290–307). Retrieved away from

Katz, J. E., Grain, R. Elizabeth., Acord, S., Dasgupta, K., & David, K. (2004). Individual mediated interaction therefore the idea of area theoretically and you can routine. When you look at the P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communications and you may area: Telecommunications yearbook twenty eight (pp. 315–371). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from

Lee, J.-A beneficial., & Liu, C.-Y. (2016). Real-label registration laws therefore the diminishing electronic anonymity in China. Arizona Global Laws Diary, 25(1), 1–34. Recovered off

). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter profiles, framework collapse, and envisioned audience. Brand new Mass media & People, 13(1), 114–133.

Maza, C. (2017, November fourteen). Christians in the China need to exchange Jesus having pictures regarding Xi Jinping otherwise beat social services. Newsweek. Retrieved regarding

Papacharissi, Z. (2009). Brand new digital geographies of social support systems: a relative investigation out-of Fb, LinkedIn and you will ASmallWorld. The fresh new Mass media & Society, 11(1–2), 199–220.

Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Digital interest: As to the reasons individuals spend time on the web. Log of Computers-Mediated Correspondence, 10(1), 00–00.

Schafer, S. (2016). Building “forbidden” identities online: Atheism into the Indonesia. Austrian Journal from Southern area – Eastern Western Studies; Vienna, 9(2), 253–267.

Smyth, S. M. (2012). The fresh new social media paradox: A symbol of self-determination otherwise a benefit to possess big brother? In the world Log regarding Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 924–950.

Van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Privacy, pseudonymity, and the institution from on the web name: Exploring the societal methods out of r/Gonewild. (more…)